InfluentialPoints.com
Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID AphidBlog
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

 

 

Brachycaudus linariae

Toadflax aphid

On this page: Identification & Distribution Other aphids on the same host

Identification & Distribution:

Adult apterae of Brachycaudus linariae are deep blackish shiny green. The last two fused rostral segments range in length from 0.135 to 0.160 mm. There are medium to large flat marginal tubercles on the pronotum and on some or all of abdominal tergites 1-5. The body length of adult Brachycaudus linariae apterae is 1.4-1.9 mm.

Brachycaudus linariae alatae have 11-33 secondary rhinaria on the third antennal segment, 6-9 on the fourth segment and 0-2 on the fifth segment. Immatures are a somewhat paler green. The micrographs below show an aptera, dorsal and ventral, in alcohol.

The clarified slide mounts below are of adult viviparous female Brachycaudus linariae : wingless strongly sclerotized form, and winged.

Micrographs of clarified mounts by permission of Roger Blackman, copyright AWP all rights reserved.

Toadflax aphids live on the basal parts of toadflax, especially yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris). Sexual morphs of the toadflax aphid have not yet been found in UK, but have been recorded in Slovakia. Brachycaudus linariae is found in parts of western and northern Europe and most of eastern Europe.

 

Other aphids on same host:

Blackman & Eastop list 3 species of aphid as feeding on yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) worldwide, and provide formal identification keys.

Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists 2 as occurring in Britain: Brachycaudus linariae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae.

Acknowledgements

Our particular thanks to Roger Blackman for images of his clarified slide mounts.

Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks