Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID AphidBlog
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

Search this site

Lachninae : Eulachnini : Cinara laricis


Identification & Distribution:

Adult apterae of Cinara laricis are dark greyish-brown to reddish brown, usually with a wax bloom (see first picture below). Abdominal tergites II - VI are speckled with numerous dark sclerites dorsally and the hairs arising from them are conspicuous (thick and spine-like with raised conical bases, see first picture below). Their siphuncular cones are blackish and conspicuous, but the pigmented radius may barely exceed the diameter of the opening. The Cinara laricis aptera body length is 3.0-5.1 mm.

The dark sclerites on the dorsum are not quite so prominent on the alate (see second picture above). The micrographs below are dorsal views of an adult aptera and an alate Cinara laricis in alcohol.

The ovipara (egg laying female) is similar to the viviparous female, and has no pericaudal wax ring. The alate male of Cinara laricis is dark brown with a variable sclerotic pattern.

Cinara laricis are found in small dense colonies on the twigs of the lower branches, or on trunks of young larch trees (Larix species). The oviparae and alate males occur in October-November. This is one of two common species of Cinara found on larch - the other is Cinara cuneomaculata. The speckled larch aphid is found throughout Europe, and is also recorded from the Far East (Mongolia, China, Korea and Japan).


Biology & Ecology:

Life cycle

Cinara laricis colonies seem to start up somewhat later than most Cinara species, presumably because larch is deciduous and nutrients are not available so early in the year.

The aptera shown in the first picture above has matured in August and is now reproducing.

Newly moulted aphids are reddish in colour.

This was taken in late October, when one would expect sexual forms to be present. The aphids shown here with (large) developing wingbuds may be developing males, or possibly brachypterous female oviparae. Note that there is also an apterous Cinara cuneomaculata in the picture top right.

Ant attendance

Cinara laricis produces copious honeydew, and is considered by Binazzi & Scheurer (2009) to be an optional myrmecophile. We have found it is usually attended by ants.

This southern wood ant has collected a large droplet of honeydew from one of the Cinara laricis. Rather than consuming it all itself, it will most likely share the droplet with other ants from the same nest, a behaviour known as trophallaxis.

Here Cinara laricis is being attended by southern wood ants (Formica rufa). Working in Russia, Novgodorova (2005) found that the speckled larch aphid was tended by four Formica species and by Lasius fuliginosus, but not by other Lasius or Myrmica species. The Formica species did not predate any of the tended aphids, even though they consumed large numbers of other aphid species such as Euceraphis. Lasius fuliginosus, on the other hand, did take some tended species, including Cinara laricis, after they decreased in the attractiveness as sources of honeydew late in the season.


Other aphids on same host:

Cinara laricis has been recorded from 6 Larix species (Larix cajanderi, Larix decidua, Larix gmelinii, Larix kaempferi, Larix kamtschatica, Larix sibirica).

Blackman & Eastop list 10 species of aphid as feeding on European larch (Larix decidua) worldwide, and provide formal identification keys (Show World list). Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists 6 as occurring in Britain (Show British list).


Damage and control

He & Yong-mu (1983) reported that Cinara laricis, along with three other aphid species, caused serious damage to Dahurian Larch (Larix daharica) used for urban greening. The reason for higher infestation on city trees, than in natural forests, was believed to be increased light levels and reduced abundance of natural enemies. Integrated control was proposed for the problem, with only limited insecticide use.


Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks


  •  Binazzi, A. & Scheurer, S. (2009). Atlas of the honeydew producing conifer aphids of Europe. Aracne. 132 pp. Introduction

  •  He, F.S.Z & Yong-mu, L. (1983). The investigation on the larch aphids in botanical garden of Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University. Abstract

  •  Novgodorova, T.A. (2005). Ant-aphid interactions in multispecies ant communities: Some ecological and ethological aspects. European Journal of Entomology 102, 495-501. Full text