Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID AphidBlog
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

Search this site

Aphidinae : Macrosiphini : Hayhurstia atriplicis


Identification & Distribution:

Hayhurstia atriplicis live on orache (Atriplex) or goosefoot (Chenopodium) inside yellowish pseudogalls (see first picture below). The pseudogalls are formed by rolling the leaves upwards. Hayhurstia atriplicis apterae are green covered with a white wax powder (see picture below). Their siphunculi are very small and slightly swollen with a small flange, and are distinctly shorter than the finger-shaped cauda. The body length of an adult aptera of Hayhurstia atriplicis is 1.5-2.9 mm.

The siphunculi and cauda are best seen in the dorsal and ventral micrographs of an aptera in alcohol below.

The clarified slide mounts below are of adult viviparous female Hayhurstia atriplicis : wingless, and winged.

Micrographs of clarified mounts by permission of Roger Blackman, copyright AWP all rights reserved.

Hayhurstia atriplicis feeds on many different species of plants in the goosefoot family, especially Atriplex and Chenopodium. In temperate climates Hayhurstia atriplicis has a sexual stage in the life cycle overwintering as eggs, but there is no host alternation. It is found widely in Europe and Asia, north and central Africa, and in North and central America.


Biology & Ecology:

Moran & Whitham (1990) looked at the host-mediated interaction between Hayhurstia atriplicis, which feeds above ground where it forms leaf galls, and Pemphigus betae which feeds underground on roots. Although the two aphid species never encounter one another directly, they share a common resource, the phloem sap of their host. The authors obtained four major results:

First, the root-feeding aphid Pemphigus betae had no significant effects on its hosts. In contrast, leaf galling by Hayhurstia atriplicis (see picture below) significantly reduced both plant mass and seed set.

Second, competitive interactions between the herbivore species depended on the level of host resistance to leaf galling by Hayhurstia atriplicis. On susceptible plants, leaf-galling colonies of Hayhurstia atriplicis greatly reduced Pemphigus betae numbers but, on plants resistant to galling, Hayhurstia atriplicis colonies were smaller and did not affect Pemphigus betae infesting roots of the same hosts.

Third, the interaction was asymmetrical; although Hayhurstia atriplicis had a strong negative effect on Pemphigus betae, the latter showed no measurable effects on Hayhurstia atriplicis.

Fourth, resistance to leaf-galling aphids was not correlated with resistance to root-feeding aphids.

We have found parasitoid mummies of Hayhurstia atriplicis several times, but each time the parasitoids had already emerged (see empty mummies below).

In Europe Hayhurstia atriplicis, is commonly parasitized by two parasitoids, Diaeretiella rapae and Ephedrus nacheri. Stary & Gonzalez (1991) pointed out that since the aphid parasitoid association is perennial, and Chenopodium groves commonly occur both in farmland and urban environments, they represent reservoirs of useful parasitoids. Diaeretiella rapae in particular is known to have a number of aphid pests in its host range.


Other aphids on same host:


Damage & Control:

There is some evidence that Hayhurstia atriplicis may play a role in the transmission of Potato virus Y (PVY) (Wyman et al., 2012) and Ethiopian Pepper Mottle Virus (EPMV) (Atsebeha et al., 2009). However, Hayhurstia atriplicis does act as reservoir for aphid parasitoids (see above), so its benefits may outweigh its harm.


Our particular thanks to Roger Blackman for images of his clarified slide mounts.

Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks


  • Atsebeha, S. et al. (2009). Diversity of aphids in the central rift valley of Ethiopia and their potential as vectors for Ethiopian Pepper Mottle Virus (EPMV). Journal of Entomology and Nematology 1(1), 1-6. Abstract

  • Moran, N.A. & Whitham, T.G. (1990). Interspecific competition between root feeding and leaf-galling aphids mediated by host-plant resistance. Ecology 71(3), 1050-1058. Abstract

  • Stary, P. & Gonzalez, D. (1991). The Chenopodium aphid, Hayhurstia atriplicis (L.) (Horn., Aphididae), a parasitoid reservoir and a source of biocontrol agents in pest management. Journal of Applied Entomology 111 (1-5), 243-248. Abstract

  • Wyman, J. et al. (2012) . Winged aphids and Potato Virus Y transmission in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin - Extension Archives 111 (1-5), 243-248. Abstract