InfluentialPoints.comBiology, images, analysis, design...
| Aphids | Find them | How to ID | AphidBlog |
| InfluentialPoints.com Biology, images, analysis, design... |
|
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" |
|
|
Hoplocallis pictaPainted holm oak aphidOn this page: Identification & Distribution Biology & Ecology Other aphids on the same host Damage & ControlIdentification & Distribution:The winged adults of Hoplocallis picta (see first picture below) are rather elongate and are pale yellow-green. They have banded antennae and the abdomen has a series of dark spinal markings with pale centres. The ratio of the length of the antennal terminal process to the base of that segment is 0.5 to 0.8. The third antennal segment has 2-4 secondary rhinaria. The body length of Hoplocallis picta is 1.8-2.1 mm.
Immature Hoplocallis picta (see second picture above) are broader and flatter than adult alates and have four longitudinal rows of pale-centred brown sclerites bearing clusters of hairs. The micrographs below show dorso-lateral views of an adult alate and an immature in alcohol.
Hoplocallis picta feeds on the undersides of oak (Quercus) leaves in Mediterranean Europe eastwards to south west Asia and India. In Europe it has been extending its range northwards into Britain, where it has been found feeding on holm oak (Quercus ilex).
Biology & Ecology:Hoplocallis picta was first reported on oak in Britain in July 2006, when small numbers were observed feeding on the leaf undersides of three young Quercus ilex in Cardiff Bay, Wales (Baker, 2009). Their populations persisted at very low levels sharing the habitat with Myzocallis schreiberi. Hoplocallis picta was otherwise only known in the UK from a handful of (sadly unpublished) suction trap records from southern England (Richard Harrington, pers. comm. to Ed Baker).
In April 2015 we found this species in small numbers on a lone very large holm oak at Ringmer in East Sussex, as in Wales sharing the habitat with Myzocallis schreiberi. In March 2016 we found much greater numbers of immature and alate Hoplocallis picta in the same location as in the previous year (see pictures above and below).
There do not appear to be any detailed studies of the ecology of the painted holm oak aphid, although various authors have noted its occurrence. Pons et al. (2006) monitored numbers on holm oak in urban green spaces in France and found that numbers peaked in April and May. Paris et al. (2009) noted the aphid was only found in May and occasionally in July and August.
Paris et al. (2009) studied honeydew collection and predation by the ants Lasius neglectus and Lasius grandis on Quercus ilex in Spain. Hoplocallis picta was rarely tended for honeydew, but was often predated, along with barkflies (Psocoptera) with which it cohabits (see picture above). Mifsud et al. (2009) report that Hoplocallis picta, Myzocallis schreiberi and Thelaxes suberi are frequent on Quercus ilex in the Maltese Islands, and often occur concurrently. Other aphids on same host:Hoplocallis picta has been recorded from 13 Quercus species. Blackman & Eastop list about 225 species of aphids as feeding on oaks worldwide, and provides formal identification keys for aphids on Quercus.
Damage and controlMelia et al. (1993) noted that the existence of aphids in the oak forests of Córdoba in Spain was not new, but the population levels were usually so low that they never bothered forestry officials. However, an unusually large outbreak of aphids on oak occurred in spring 1992. The aphids Hoplocallis picta, Thelaxes suberi, Lachnus roboris and Myzocallis komareki were all present, with Hoplocallis being the most widespread, abundant and severe. In early April and May the situation was getting worse, and trees were dripping with honeydew. The aphid population increased greatly, apparently with no parasites and predators controlling it. One parasitoid species was present (Trioxys curvicaudus), but few mummies were found, and it was concluded that parasitism was unimportant in controlling numbers. Given the seriousness of the situation and inexperience in forest aphid control, it was decided to try out several methods. From the beginning selective aphicides were discarded on the grounds of cost. Instead they focused on cheap products used against defoliating caterpillars, namely malathion and pyrethrins applied both as liquid ULV and by dusting. Malathion appeared quite effective however it was applied, whilst pyrethrins were ineffective. One can only hope that such wide scale application of broad spectrum and/or residual (in the case of malathion) insecticides would no longer be considered acceptable on environmental grounds.
| ||||||||||||||||||
