InfluentialPoints.com
Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID AphidBlog
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

Search this site

 

 

Metopolophium dirhodum

Rose - grain aphid

On this page: Identification & Distribution Biology & Ecology Other aphids on the same host

Identification & Distribution:

The adult apterae of Metopolophium dirhodum are medium-sized spindle-shaped aphids which range from green to yellowish green, with a brighter green longitudinal mid-dorsal stripe (see pictures below) (cf. Metopolophium albidum which has no green spinal stripe). The antennae are about 0.75 times the body length, and are mainly pale apart from the apices of segments III-V, and parts of segment 6 which are dusky or black (cf. Metopolophium albidum which has antennae that become progressively darker from the base to the apex). The apical rostral segment (RIV+V) is 0.61-0.72 times the length of the second hind tarsal segment (HTII) (cf. Metopolophium tenerum which has RIV+V 0.92-1.10 times longer than HTII and cf. Metopolophium fasciatum on Arrhenatherum which has RIV+V 0.65-0.78 times longer than HTII ). The siphunculi are long and pale, with slightly dusky tips and are 1.3-1.9 times longer than the cauda (cf. Metopolophium fasciatum on Arrhenatherum which has siphunculi 1.7-2.0 times longer than the cauda). The cauda is pale. The body length of Metopolophium dirhodum apterae is 1.6-2.9 mm.

The Metopolophium dirhodum alate (see second picture above) has a pale yellow-green abdomen with darker green markings and sometimes some indistinct brownish cross-bars on anterior tergites. (see picture below).

The micrographs below show an apterous adult vivipara, and an alate vivipara (ventral) of Metopolophium dirhodum.

The clarified slide mounts below are of adult viviparous female Metopolophium dirhodum : wingless, and winged.

Guest image(s) by permission of Roger Blackman copyright AWP all rights reserved.

The rose - grain aphid host alternates from rose (Rosa species) as the primary host in spring and early summer to cereals and grasses, especially wheat, barley and maize, as the secondary host. In mild winters they may overwinter on grasses parthenogenetically. Large numbers on cereals can cause economic damage. Metopolophium dirhodum also transmit maize mosaic virus and barley yellow dwarf virus.

 

Biology & Ecology

Life cycle

Overwintering eggs laid on rose hatch in March to give fundatrices in April (see picture below of large fundatrix with offspring).

Alatae develop in the second and third generations which then migrate to the secondary hosts, grasses and cereals.

Populations then increase greatly on the secondary hosts probably reaching a peak in June-July.

The return migration of gynoparae to rose occurs in October-November, and their offspring develop to oviparae (see pictures below).

The oviparae of Metopolophium dirhodum on rose (see pictures below) are whitish, pale yellow or pink. Those shown above were found on the undersides of rose leaves in late October and November. After mating, the oviparae lay overwintering eggs on the rose stems.

 

Other aphids on same host:

Primary hosts
Secondary hosts

Acknowledgements

Our particular thanks to Roger Blackman for images of his clarified slide mounts.

We also thank Hadlow College and Middle Farm, East Sussex for their kind assistance, and permission to sample.

Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks