Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID AphidBlog
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

Search this site

Aphidinae : Macrosiphini : Pterocomma tremulae


Pterocomma tremulae

Aspen bark aphid

On this page: Identification & Distribution Other aphids on the same host

Identification & Distribution:

Apterae of Pterocomma tremulae (see first picture below) are dark warm brown or olive brown and are dusted with powdered wax. The terminal process is 1.5-2.0 times as long as the base of the last antennal segment. The second antennal segment has 8-12 hairs (cf.Pterocomma populeum which has 4-6 hairs on that segment.) The third antennal segment has 4-79 secondary rhinaria and the fourth antennal segment has 0-9 secondary rhinaria (cf. Pterocomma populeum which has none on the third antennal segment).The abdomen has large marginal and pleurospinal sclerites and marginal tubercles on the abdominal tergites. The pale yellowish siphunculi are slightly swollen. The body length of Pterocomma tremulae is 2.5-4.3 mm.

The micrographs below show an adult Pterocomma tremulae aptera, dorsal and ventral, in alcohol.

Pterocomma tremula is usually found on suckers and two-year-old twigs of aspen (Populus tremula). No sexual morphs have been recorded, which is surprising given its northerly distribution. It is nearly always attended by ants. Pterocomma tremulae is found in northern, central and eastern Europe and west Siberia.


Biology & Ecology:

The main sign of a Pterocomma tremulae colony is usually the presence of large numbers of ants in a cluster on the branch.

Pterocomma tremulae is always attended by ants, whether by a Formica species or by Lasius fuliginosus. At Dundreggan in Scotland, tending was done by hairy wood ants (Formica lugubris), as can be seen in the pictures below.

Large numbers of ants could be found tending relatively small colonies of aphids on the twigs and branches of aspen (Populus tremula).


Although Formica lugubris were very attentive towards the aphids, it was noticeable that they were not very persistent in defending aphid colonies. The ants tended to scatter at even a relatively minor disturbance.

Nevertheless they seemed to be effective at keeping away most aphid predators. The only exception to this were cecidomyiid flies which unusually were laying their eggs directly on the aphids, rather than on adjoining vegetation. The picture below shows an adult Pterocomma tremulae with at least six eggs laid on its back, as well as one or two eggs laid on young nymphs.

Everything in a quite extensive literature indicates that Aphidoletes lay their eggs on the plant near aphids, not directly on the aphids. For example, Lucas & Brodeur (1999) working on potato aphids (Macrosiphum euphorbiae) found that Aphidoletes aphidimyza laid its eggs on the host plant in aphid infested sites with high plant trichome densities (in other words pubescent parts). We have instead found that Aphidoletes species often lay eggs directly on aphids - not just with Pterocomma (see are these mites or eggs?) but also with Macrosiphum rosae, Cavariella theobaldi, Chaitophorus populialbae, and Cinara laricis.


Other aphids on same host:

Blackman & Eastop list 17 species of aphid as feeding on European aspen (Populus tremula) worldwide, and provide formal identification keys (Show World list). Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists 11 as occurring in Britain (Show British list).


Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks


  • Lucas, E. & Brodeur, J. (1999). Oviposition site selection by the predatory midge Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Environmental Entomology 28(4), 622-627. Abstract