Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus

Identification & Distribution:

The adult aptera of Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus is medium-sized dull reddish brown to brownish with the dorsum sclerotized and with a rugose texture. The head is spiculose and the antennae are long and thin. The antennal tubercles are well developed with their inner faces steep-sided or apically convergent. The siphunculi are dark and strongly swollen between the constricted basal and strongly flanged apical parts. The siphunculi are 2.5-3 times the length of the short triangular cauda. The body length of Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus apterae is 2.0-2.5 mm.

Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus alatae (see second picture above) are dull reddish brown to brownish black with no black dorsal abdominal patch.

The clarified slide mounts below are of adult viviparous female Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus : wingless, and winged.

Micrographs of clarified mounts by permission of Roger Blackman, copyright AWP all rights reserved.

The currant stem aphid does not host alternate but feeds only on currants (Ribes spp.). It feeds in damp shady places mainly on the old wood of lower shoots of redcurrant, but also on the young shoots and leaves. Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus is not thought to be of economic importance. It is found in Britain, northern Europe and west Siberia.

Biology & Ecology

The currant stem aphid is a rare aphid, which is observed even less often than might be expected given its habitat preference. Like most other Rhopalosiphonus species Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus likes a very humid habitat, which it finds by feeding low down on redcurrant stems, usually just above the ground surface.

The colony shown above was found in deciduous woodland in May 2012. Most of these developing immatures have wing buds and are therefore destimed to be alatae. They will most likely migrate away from this site to found new colonies. As is usual for Rhopalosiphonus aphids, the colony was not attended by ants.

Most of the aphids in the picture above are second and third instar nymphs of Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus.

Other aphids on same host:

Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus has been recorded from 3 Ribes species (Ribes nigrum, Ribes rubrum Ribes spicatum ssp. hispidulum).

• Blackman & Eastop list 18 species of aphid as feeding on redcurrant (Ribes rubrum) worldwide, and provide formal identification keys.

  Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists 15 as occurring in Britain: Aphis fabae, Aphis grossulariae, Aphis schneideri, Aphis triglochinis, Cryptomyzus galeopsidis, Cryptomyzus galeopsidis ssp. citrinus, Cryptomyzus maudamanti, Cryptomyzus ribis, Eriosoma grossulariae, Eriosoma ulmi, Hyperomyzus lactucae, Hyperomyzus pallidus, Hyperomyzus rhinanthi, Nasonovia ribisnigri and Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus.

• Blackman & Eastop list 22 species of aphid as feeding on blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) worldwide, and provide formal identification keys.

  Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists 16 as occurring in Britain: Aphis fabae, Aphis grossulariae, Aphis oenotherae, Aphis schneideri, Aphis triglochinis, Cryptomyzus galeopsidis, Cryptomyzus galeopsidis ssp. citrinus, Cryptomyzus galeopsidis ssp. dickeri, Cryptomyzus ribis, Eriosoma ulmi, Hyperomyzus lactucae, Hyperomyzus pallidus, Hyperomyzus rhinanthi, Nasonovia houghtonensis ssp. similis, Nasonovia ribisnigri and Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus.

• Blackman & Eastop list 4 species of aphid as feeding on Ribes spicatum ssp. hispidulum worldwide, and provide formal identification keys.

  Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists all 4 as occurring in Britain: Cryptomyzus ribis, Hyperomyzus lactucae, Hyperomyzus rhinanthi and Rhopalosiphoninus ribesinus.

Acknowledgements Our particular thanks to Roger Blackman for images of his clarified slide mounts. Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks