Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID AphidBlog
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

Search this site

Aphidinae : Macrosiphini : Uroleucon obscurum


Uroleucon obscurum

Large hawkweed aphid

On this page: Identification & Distribution Other aphids on the same host

Identification & Distribution:

Adult apterae of Uroleucon obscurum are reddish brown to bronze with black antennae and siphunculi and a yellow cauda. The antennal terminal process is 3.8-6.2 times longer than the base of antennal segment 6. The apical segment of the rostrum (RIV+V) is 1.06-1.29 times the length of the second hind tarsal segment (HTII). The body hairs are rather long, and placed on distinct scleroites. The femora are yellow basally and black on the distal half. The tibiae have the basal half yellowish brown. The siphunculi are 1.1-1.6 times the length of the cauda. The body length of an adult Uroleucon obscurum aptera is rather less than for most species at 1.8-3.7 mm.

The images below show clarified slide mounts of (first) an adult apterous Uroleucon obscurum and (second) an alate Uroleucon obscurum.

Images of clarified mounts by permission of Roger Blackman, copyright AWP all rights reserved.

The large hawkweed aphid does not host alternate. It can be found on the upper parts of stems of hawkweed (Hieracium spp.). Sexual forms appear in September, and the species overwinters in the egg stage. Uroleucon obscurum is distributed throughout Europe and into Asia.


Other aphids on same host:

Uroleucon obscurum has been recorded on 26 Hieracium species.


Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks